The grades are in: Non-conference Cougar report card
Posted by Nuss on January 4, 2008
On the eve of WSU’s Pac-10 opener, this seems like a good time to take stock of how each player and coach Tony Bennett performed during the non-conference schedule in their effort to prepare for league play and a run in the NCAA Tournament. The starters generally grade out well, but the bench is still a pretty big question mark.
As would befit a teacher, each will receive a letter grade along with a synopsis of what’s gone well, and what needs to go better. Keep in mind, very few games have been on TV, so a lot of these perceptions come filtered through reports I’ve read and raw statistics.
STARTERS
Derrick Low – Perhaps no player holds the key to the Cougs’ chances of a deep run in the NCAA Tournament this year as much as Low. When he is assertive and effective on offense, this team is virtually unstoppable, given its defensive capabilities. The problem is, he’s still prone to long stretches of missed shots and unselfish play that cripple the offense. He’s explosive, but those explosions have been too far and few between so far. He must be more aggressive in the Pac-10 for this team to reach its full potential, and he cannot allow a few missed shots to discourage him. His 13.1 points per game leads the team, but this grade reflects what we’re going to need out of him. GRADE: B-
Kyle Weaver – The multi-talented guard has done nothing to diminish his reputation this year. If anything, he’s enhanced it and is well on his way to another all-Pac-10 selection. There really is very little to complain about, as his offensive game is really blossoming to complement his defensive effort. While he’ll never be a long range sharpshooter, defenses at least now have to play him honest as he’s shown he can hit the occasional 3. GRADE: A
Taylor Rochestie — He hasn’t hit double-digits in scoring in more than a month, but it doesn’t matter. He’s doing all the little things the team needs for him to do: Great defense, solid decisions with the ball, timely shots. He has had a couple of games where he’s had rashes of turnovers — in a three-game stretch against Baylor, Gonzaga and Portland State, he turned the ball over 17 times — but they seem to be aberrations rather than trends, as he’s turned the ball over just nine times in the other nine games. Pretty good. His assists are also way up. GRADE: A-
Aron Baynes – There were reports heading into the year that Baynes was poised for a breakout year. It turned out to not be an exaggeration, as the big Aussie has shown improved conditioning, footwork, and even hands. He is a force down low that few teams have been, or will be, able to match up with. The one complaint, still, is that he’s prone to foul problems. This is a team that already is perilously thin up front, and Baynes still can be found reaching for the ball when defending guards on the high pick and roll. It’s silly, and it still is taking him out of games. At some point, it has to stop if he wants to become a dominant player, which he can be. GRADE: A-
Robbie Cowgill — Easiest grade of all the players. Cowgill is giving the Cougs an active inside presence and is showing an unbelievable knack for knowing just what his team needs and any given moment and providing it. Think back to that Baylor game — the Cougs don’t win without Cowgill’s 18 points in that game. How about his 11 boards against Gonzaga, keeping the Bulldogs from gaining extra possessions? Weaver and Low get all the press, but it’s possible Cowgill will go down as the most beloved leader of this basketball renaissance. GRADE: A
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Breakdowns | 2 Comments »
No. 5 UCLA 76, No. 20 Stanford 67 – I was one of the people before this year who thought UCLA was a lock for the Final Four and certainly head and shoulders above the rest of the Pac-10. But then Darren Collison got hurt, and the Bruins missed Arron Afflalo’s outside shooting a lot more than most of us thought they would, and UCLA suddenly looked vulnerable.